Documentation the Board will be reviewing is supposed to be available on the Fed website slightly in advance of the webcast.
Documentation the Board will be reviewing is supposed to be available on the Fed website slightly in advance of the webcast.
Choose to attend the session on regulatory compliance, health care reform – or both! Click here for more details and to register.
"Pay at the Pump Fraud Grows" cites card skimming fraud popping up increasingly across the country. In response to growing press coverage of convenience store fraud, a representative of the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) claims that pay-at-pump skimming accounts for a low percentage of card compromises, but media attention has fueled public concerns. He goes on to say that "most convenience stores are concerned about pay-at-the-pump skimming, but they can only focus on so much."
In "Michael's Breach: Who's Liable" CU InfoSecurity reports on a Michael's customer's account being compromised to the tune of $1,300 after she made a $20 purchase at a Michael's store. She subsequently filed a class action suit. The article goes on to address the controversy over whether merchants or issuers should be assuming more responsibility. Merchants claim both share equally.
A free national webinar to assist victims of natural disasters will be sponsored this Thursday at 12 p.m by the CU Association of the Dakotas. Titled “In the Face of Disaster”, the event will bring together a national panel of speakers who have direct experience with credit union disaster recovery efforts. The goal of the webinar is to educate and inform credit unions in three specific areas:
- How can credit unions guide and direct members to FEMA resources?
- What types of FEMA loans can credit unions offer to members who are rebuilding?
- What type of risk model should credit unions use to anticipate loan defaults?
The webinar panel includes credit union executives with experience dealing with natural disasters (related to storm, wind and water damage) such as Hurricane Katrina, as well as professionals with more than 20 years of experience in the field of disaster planning, mitigations and recovery. Speakers include:
- Dawn Harris, EVP-COO of Campus Federal Credit Union in Baton Rouge, Louisiana
- Dave Mistick, President of Circumspex, a disaster recovery expert and consultant
- Amy Johnson, Director of Learning, Credit Union Association of the Dakotas
Editorial: Fed Interchange Cap to Spur Debit Card Limits
Posted by AVCU on 3:47 PM
Labels: interchange
But hold up a minute. In order to offer free checking, Hernandez argues, a bank must have customers that bring in other business, or incur enough fees to cover the maintenance and servicing expenses on the account. These types of accounts used to be subsidized by accounts that generated significant non-interest income such as debit card interchange fees. The Durbin amendment severely alters the non-interest side of income, making free checking a loss leader product, and a burden that community banks will not be able to offset, forcing them to charge for checking.
Hernandez also points out fallout harm to the very businesses the Durbin amendment was intended to protect. A study experts from the University of Chicago Law School, the Brookings Institute and the MIT Sloan School of Management concludes that:
- Small businesses will face higher retail banking fees and the loss of valuable services as banks offset the loss of interchange revenue.
- Because of increases in banking fees, the number of unbanked individuals will increase, with many low-income individuals having to use higher-priced alternative financial service providers, such as check-cashers.
- The small businesses that see an increase in bank fees will not receive offsetting benefit from lower debt card interchange fees because they don't accept debit cards, but . . .
- Large retailers will receive a windfall of $17.2-$19.9 billion dollars in the first 24 months of the proposed rule being in effect.
Purpose | Rates 1/1 - 6/30 | Rates 7/1 - 12/31 |
Business | 51 | 55.5 |
Medical/Moving | 19 | 23.5 |
Charitable | 14 | 14 |
NCUA Pre-Paid Assessment: Free Audio Call
Posted by AVCU on 8:22 AM
Labels: corporate, Misc, Operations, Regulatory
$330k ACH Theft: Maine Bank Not Guilty
Posted by AVCU on 7:38 AM
Labels: compliance, Operations, Technology
The case raises questions about how much security financial institutions may be reasonably required to provide commercial customers. It could set a precedent for liability in circumstances where customer systems are hacked and banking credentials are stolen. Small and medium-sized businesses around the United States have lost hundreds of millions of dollars in recent years to such activity, known as fraudulent ACH (Automated Clearing House) transfers.
Patco, a family-owned business in Sanford sued Ocean Bank after discovering that hackers were siphoning about $100K per day from its online account. The hackers sent a malicious e-mail to employees allowing them to install a password-stealing trojan on an employee computer. The hackers then used the credentials to initiate a series of electronic money transfers. Nearly $600K was transferred before Patco noticed.
Leahy: Senate Interchange Defeat to Put Money in Vermonter Pockets
Posted by AVCU on 8:50 PM
Labels: interchange, Legislative
“Next month the Federal Reserve will implement long-overdue reforms to rein in excessive swipe fees that banks charge merchants whenever consumers use debit cards for their purchases. These sky-high fees are hurting small businesses in Vermont and across the country, adding costs that mean higher prices for consumers. I opposed this attempt to delay implementation of these new rules. This vote is an all-too-rare victory for consumers and America’s Main Street economy. Amid our fragile economic recovery, we cannot delay any effort to ease the burden on small merchants and hardworking Vermonters.
I supported adding these provisions to last year’s Wall Street Reform Bill, along with other reforms that I championed to ensure that small businesses can offer discounts to consumers for paying by cash instead of by credit card, and to make sure small businesses cannot be prohibited from setting minimum transaction amounts when cards are used. These reforms will deliver pocketbook benefits to Vermonters. Because of these reforms, Vermonters will no longer have to pay more for a gallon of milk simply because the credit card companies are demanding high fees on small transactions, or because banks will not let grocers offer discounts for cash over credit.”To write to Senator Leahy go to http://leahy.senate.gov/contact/
Welch Lauds Senate Kill of Interchange Delay
Posted by AVCU on 8:36 PM
Labels: interchange, Legislative
"This is a long-overdue, good day for consumers and Main Street businesses. Visa, MasterCard and the big banks have been fighting ferociously to gut swipe fee reforms. Why? Because they want to maintain their unchecked monopoly pricing power that has for years allowed them to charge the highest swipe fees in the world. I congratulate Senator Durbin and those who withstood the withering pressure from big banks to preserve this important consumer protection.
Earlier in a "Roll Call" editorial column appearing the morning of the Senate vote on Tester's interchange delay amendment, Vermont Congressman Peter Welch slammed Tester's effort as a "kill" instead of "delay" measure, citing it as "a diversionary tactic that allows huge banks to maintain an unbalanced and unfair profit center at the expense of small businesses that are the lifeblood of communities in Vermont and throughout the country." Roll Call is the daily publication of DC legislators and staff.
Welch goes on to claim that:
- U.S. swipe fees are the highest in the world,
- Debit card swipe fees are 10 times what it actually costs to process the transaction
- Swipe fees add 1% to 3% to the cost of all goods and services, regardless of form of payment
- That claims that community banks and credit unions will be hurt are bogus, and
- That claims that merchants won't pass long the interchange windfall equates to "we’ve been doing such a good job ripping off consumers, we can’t let someone else do it!”
To write to Congressman Welch go to http://www.house.gov/formwelch/issue_subscribe.htm
YEAs ---54 | ||
Akaka (D-HI) Alexander (R-TN) Ayotte (R-NH) Baucus (D-MT) Begich (D-AK) Bennet (D-CO) Blunt (R-MO) Boozman (R-AR) Carper (D-DE) Coats (R-IN) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Coons (D-DE) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) Gillibrand (D-NY) | Hagan (D-NC) Hatch (R-UT) Heller (R-NV) Hoeven (R-ND) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Johanns (R-NE) Johnson (D-SD) Johnson (R-WI) Kirk (R-IL) Kyl (R-AZ) Lee (R-UT) Manchin (D-WV) McCain (R-AZ) McCaskill (D-MO) McConnell (R-KY) Mikulski (D-MD) Moran (R-KS) | Murkowski (R-AK) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Paul (R-KY) Portman (R-OH) Risch (R-ID) Roberts (R-KS) Rubio (R-FL) Schumer (D-NY) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Stabenow (D-MI) Tester (D-MT) Thune (R-SD) Toomey (R-PA) Warner (D-VA) Webb (D-VA) Wicker (R-MS) |
NAYs ---45 | ||
Barrasso (R-WY) Bingaman (D-NM) Blumenthal (D-CT) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Brown (R-MA) Burr (R-NC) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Casey (D-PA) Chambliss (R-GA) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Enzi (R-WY) | Feinstein (D-CA) Franken (D-MN) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Harkin (D-IA) Inouye (D-HI) Isakson (R-GA) Kerry (D-MA) Klobuchar (D-MN) Kohl (D-WI) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lugar (R-IN) | Menendez (D-NJ) Merkley (D-OR) Murray (D-WA) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Shaheen (D-NH) Snowe (R-ME) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Vitter (R-LA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wyden (D-OR) |
Not Voting - 1 | ||
Lieberman (ID-CT) |
Senate Rejects CU Plea; Durbin Wins w/Leahy-Sanders Support
Posted by AVCU on 4:19 PM
Labels: interchange, Legislative
- Over 1/2 of the Senate voted in support of further study before implementing interchange controls.
- That's 2/3 more than those who supported us in last year's Durbin amendment vote.
- Some Senators voting against the Tester-Corker amendment said they wanted to first see the final Fed regulation, and that they would assist after it is published.
- Considering the heated debate we generated on the issue, it's likely safe to say that legislators won't have the desire to challenge credit card interchange for some time to come.
- Opponents to the Tester amendment, like Vermont Senators Sanders and Leahy are so adamant that credit unions are protected by the so-called carve-out for institutions $10B and below that we have the opportunity for them to press the Federal Reserve to insure it will work in the final regulation, and to press them to act if it does not.